EU declares several Russian diplomats persona non grata

The European Union has declared a number of Russian diplomats working in Brussels persona non grata, the bloc’s foreign policy chief said on Tuesday.

“Today, I decided to designate persona non grata a number of officials of the Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the EU for engaging in activities contrary to their diplomatic status,” Josep Borrell said in remarks as the EU put forward proposals for its fifth sanctions package against Moscow.

He said the EU has been “very clear” in its position and “will continue to advance the sanctions as long as the Russian aggression continues.”

The fresh sanctions are an attempt to “further cripple (Russian President Vladimir) Putin’s war machinery, following the atrocities committed by the Russian armed forces in Bucha and other places under Russian occupation in Ukraine,” said Borrell.

He said Russia’s actions in Bucha and “the brutal siege of Mariupol” have shown “the true face of this war, the true face of the Kremlin and its war against Ukraine and its people.”

Putin and Moscow are facing vehement criticism from Western leaders after Ukraine accused Russian forces of committing a “genocide” and “war crimes” in Bucha.

Russia has rejected the allegations as a “fake news attack,” arguing that images of dead bodies and footage of slain civilians that have drawn global outrage were staged after Russian forces withdrew from the city.

Borrell said the proposals including scaling up “bans on certain exports, including technologies and jet fuel … banning import of goods which provide significant revenue to the state budget, prohibiting import of some fuels, particularly coal.”

“We are also proposing further financial measures and prohibiting Russian vessels from entering EU ports,” he added.

The sanctions list will be expanded to include dozens of more people “from politics to the business sector” who are “engaged in propaganda activities,” said Borrell.

More entities from Russia’s financial, military, industrial and transport sectors will also be targeted, “among them four important Russian banks that will not only be taken out from the SWIFT system, but will also be forbidden from participating in any kind of financial transactions in the EU,” he added.

“The aim of our sanctions is to stop the reckless, inhuman and aggressive behavior of the Russian troops and make clear to the decision makers in the Kremlin that their illegal aggression comes at a heavy cost,” the EU official said.

Source: Anadolu Agency

1.2 billion people are impacted by Ukraine war: UN chief

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres called the war in Ukraine on Tuesday “one of the greatest challenges ever to the international order” because it has affected billions of people worldwide.

“Our analysis indicates that 74 developing countries, with a total population of 1.2 billion people, are particularly vulnerable to spiking food, energy and fertilizer costs,” said Guterres in an address to the UN Security Council.

The UN chief said that the world is “dealing with a full-fledged invasion” in “violation of the UN Charter, and with several aims, including redrawing the internationally-recognized borders” between Russia and Ukraine.

Guterres noted that the war has disrupted supply chains and increased the cost of transportation, putting even more pressure on the developing world.

“People caught up in crisis around the world cannot pay the price for this war,” said Guterres. “Far beyond Ukraine’s borders, the war has led to massive increases in the prices of food, energy and fertilizers, because Russia and Ukraine are lynchpins of these markets.”

“For all these reasons, it is more urgent by the day to silence the guns,” he added.

Russia’s war against Ukraine, which started on Feb. 24, has met international outrage, with the European Union, US, and UK, among others, implementing tough sanctions on Moscow.

At least 1,480 civilians have been killed in Ukraine and 2,195 injured, according to UN estimates, with the true figure feared to be far higher.

More than 4.21 million Ukrainians have also fled to other countries, with about 7 million more internally displaced, according to the UN refugee agency.

Source: Anadolu Agency

Over 1,800 journalists, media workers killed worldwide since 1995, data shows

More than 1,800 journalists and media workers have been killed worldwide in the past 27 years, with a majority falling prey to war, conflict, terrorist groups and organized crime gangs.

Some 1,814 journalists were killed between 1995 and 2022, according to data compiled from various sources by Anadolu Agency ahead of the Remembrance Day for Killed Journalists in Turkiye on Wednesday.

The day is observed in Turkiye in memory of Ottoman journalist Hasan Fehmi Bey, who was murdered by unidentified assailants in Istanbul on April 6, 1909.

Between 2012-2021, 905 journalists or media workers were killed in the line of duty – almost two deaths every week, the data showed.

More than 50% of all journalists and media staff killed since 1995 died in war and conflict zones or areas where terrorist groups or organized crime gangs were active, according to the data.

At least 18 journalists, including six foreign journalists, have been killed in Ukraine since Russia started the war on Feb. 24, according to the Ukrainian Culture and Information Policy Ministry.

With rampant organized crime, Mexico ranks as the most dangerous country for journalists and media workers, with 143 journalists, including 11 women, killed between 2000-2021.

According to the 2021 Global Impunity Index report by the Committee to Protect Journalists, Somalia was the world’s worst country for unsolved killings of journalists, followed by Syria, Iraq, South Sudan, Afghanistan, Mexico, Philippines, Brazil, Pakistan, Russia, Bangladesh and India.

Source: Anadolu Agency

UK government orders new scientific review into fracking

The UK government on Tuesday said it has ordered a new report on the impact of fracking, the process used to extract shale gas.

The British Geological Survey (BGS) has been commissioned to advise on the latest scientific advice around the practice and is expected to submit its report before the end of June.

The decision comes two days before the government is due to publish its new energy strategy, and amid the global energy uncertainty sparked by the Russia-Ukraine war.

Fracking was effectively banned in the UK in 2019 after a study said it could not rule out “unacceptable” consequences to local communities, following tremors in Lancashire in northwestern England.

Fracking involves drilling into the earth and pumping a mixture of water, sand and chemicals at high pressures to fracture shale rock layer and release trapped gas.

“We have always been, and always will be, guided by the science on shale gas. It remains the case that fracking in England would take years of exploration and development before commercial quantities of gas could be produced for the market, and would certainly have no effect on prices in the near term,” said British Business Secretary Kwasi Kwarteng.

“However, there will continue to be an ongoing demand for oil and gas over the coming decades as we transition to cheap renewable energy and new nuclear power. In light of Putin’s criminal invasion of Ukraine, it is absolutely right that we explore all possible domestic energy sources.”

He stressed that the pause on fracking will remain in place “unless the latest scientific evidence demonstrates that shale gas extraction is safe, sustainable and of minimal disturbance to those living and working nearby.”

In a nod to public concerns, Kwarteng added that the study would be “desk-based” and that “no drilling of any further test wells or seismic monitoring will take place.”

Fracking is an issue that has split Cabinet ministers in government and remains controversial among the British public after the Lancashire tremors.

The BGS has also been asked to explore whether there are new fracking methods that can reduce the risk of tremors and if there are areas outside of Lancashire that could be at lower risk of seismic activity.

Cuadrilla, an oil and gas exploration and production company, had previously been told by the government to fill its three shale gas testing wells in Lancashire by June 2022, but last week had its deadline extended to June 2023.

Source: Anadolu Agency

District Court Closes the Door Permanently on Wickfire’s Meritless Claims

After Wickfire suffered a devastating loss at the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Wickfire nonetheless continued pursuing meritless claims at a District Court. The District Court rejected Wickfire’s attempts and dismissed Wickfire’s claims permanently. This ends Wickfire’s eight-year lawsuit and provides TriMax with complete vindication

AUSTIN, Texas, April 04, 2022 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) — Wickfire suffered the latest in an extensive line of litigation defeats to TriMax. This time, a District Court dismissed Wickfire’s meritless claims permanently.

In 2021, an Appellate Court ruled that Wickfire lacked any evidence supporting its multi-million-dollar claims against TriMax. Undeterred by this monumental loss, Wickfire tried its hand once more and failed.

After losing at the Appellate Court, Wickfire moved a District Court to order TriMax pay Wickfire more than $400,000. This led to a flurry of findings and orders against Wickfire:

  • In February 2022, Federal Magistrate Judge Susan Hightower found that Wickfire’s motion lacked merit. In reaching her determination, the Magistrate Judge recognized “excessive costs and delays” due to Wickfire’s “litigation tactics.”
  • After that, United States District Judge Robert Pitman issued an Order agreeing with the Magistrate Judge’s findings and fully denied Wickfire’s motion.
  • On March 15, 2022, the Western District of Texas issued a Final Judgment, finding that Wickfire shall “TAKE NOTHING” on all its claims against TriMax and its principals.
  • In the same “TAKE NOTHING” judgment, the District Court declared that Wickfire’s claims shall be “DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE,” thereby preventing Wickfire from continuing to assert its meritless claims against TriMax in the future.

The orders and findings appear in published opinions from the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, Case Number 17-3043040 and the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas, Case No. 1:14-CV-0034-RP.

The lawsuit centered around Google AdWords Auctions, an online-auction platform where companies like TriMax and Wickfire compete for advertising space. Wickfire asserted a series of claims against TriMax, but as to each one, Wickfire failed. Wickfire alleged TriMax intentionally interfered with Wickfire’s contracts, intentionally interfered with Wickfire’s prospective business, and committed civil conspiracy. An Appellate Court found “Wickfire offered no such proof” and declared that each of these claims failed.

After the Appellate Court found an earlier District Court judgment awarding $2.3 million to Wickfire to be erroneous due to the lack of any supporting evidence, the District Court more recently issued the “TAKE NOTHING” judgment. Through the “TAKE NOTHING” judgment, Wickfire received no award and, conversely, was ordered to pay its own attorneys’ fees and costs.

In the same lawsuit, the jury previously found Wickfire LLC and its co-owners, Chet Hall and Jon Brown, to have intentionally interfered with TriMax Media’s business. TriMax argued that Wickfire intentionally interfered with TriMax’s contracts by (1) paying kickbacks to merchant representatives in exchange for exclusivity agreements; (2) impersonating TriMax by placing unauthorized ads that plagiarized TriMax’s ad copy and contained other identifying information of TriMax; (3) repeatedly clicking on TriMax ads in order to artificially increase TriMax’s costs (known as “click fraud”); and (4) using an automated software program to manipulate the Google auction system (known as “bid jamming”).

TriMax presented evidence to the jury that Wickfire had been suspended from over 200 Google accounts, violated merchant terms, and employed fake user agents and proxies to conceal its identity. The jury also saw evidence that Google referred to Wickfire as “Known Fraudsters” and that Wickfire registered the domain name “GoogleClickFraud.com”.

TriMax also presented evidence regarding Wickfire’s destruction of evidence. During the litigation, Wickfire wiped all the data from its Chief Technology Officer, Jon Brown’s, laptop and then failed to disclose that information to TriMax or the District Court. Once TriMax uncovered the destruction, Wickfire claimed it was necessary, since the laptop had been stolen during a home burglary. However, the police report—which TriMax obtained independently after Wickfire failed to produce a copy—contradicted Wickfire’s story because it mentioned nothing about an allegedly stolen laptop.

While the jury heard extensive evidence about Wickfire’s conduct comprising Wickfire’s intentional interference against TriMax (which the jury found to have occurred), some of the most devastating evidence was excluded. For example, the jury was not permitted to see:

  • The police report from the burglary;
  • Registration documents showing Wickfire as the owner of “BitchesOfFacebook.com” and “PokeBitches.com”;
  • An e-mail from a merchant representative who, after refusing to accept the alleged kickbacks, referred to Wickfire as “criminals”;
  • Screenshots of Wickfire’s ads impersonating TriMax’s;
  • An e-mail from a merchant terminating TriMax after wrongly believing TriMax was the source of the impersonating ads;
  • An e-mail from a merchant complaining that Wickfire violated trademark terms and plagiarized TriMax’s ads;
  • A lengthy technical report that, according to a world-renowned computer expert, proves conclusively that Wickfire committed extensive click fraud against TriMax;
  • A real-time video demonstrating the bid-jamming TriMax experienced;
  • A summary of hundreds of TriMax’s merchant contracts interfered with by bid-jamming; and
  • E-mails from other competitors of Wickfire complaining about Wickfire’s bidding tactics.

Despite the jury’s finding against Wickfire, Chet Hall, and Jon Brown for intentional interference with TriMax’s business, no damages against Wickfire were awarded. This was, as the District Court noted, a finding reached by the jury after “the jury heard evidence that Google investigated Wickfire’s AdWords bidding and determined it was permissible.”

However, the District Court’s Final Judgment did not disturb the jury’s finding that Wickfire, Chet Hall, and Jon Brown committed the intentional interference in the first place. Thus, the interference finding against Wickfire, Chet Hall, and Jon Brown stands and is final.

Prior to issuing the “TAKE NOTHING” judgment and dismissing Wickfire’s meritless claims permanently, a Magistrate Judge considered a motion to disqualify Wickfire attorney, Katy Hall (formerly known as Katy Atlas). TriMax alleged that while in possession of TriMax’s sensitive documents, Katy Hall began a personal and intimate relationship with Chet Hall (CEO and Co-Founder of Wickfire, and, himself a party to the case), divorced her prior husband, had a child with Chet Hall, and married Chet Hall after he divorced his prior wife. TriMax also alleged that Katy Hall wrongfully accepted an in-house position with Wickfire while in possession of the documents. Katy Hall is currently Chief Operating Officer of Wickfire’s BuyersGuide.org. A Magistrate Judge however, ruled that TriMax could not “meet its heavy burden to prove that disqualification is warranted” and denied the motion to disqualify Katy Hall.

TriMax’s CEO, Laura Woodruff, commented: “After the Fifth Circuit exonerated TriMax in 2021, we were surprised that Wickfire chose to continue asserting meritless claims with the District Court. However, we are pleased with the recent orders by the District Court, which—like the Appellate Court before it—repeatedly rejected Wickfire’s claims for lack of merit. We are, however, still disappointed that Google and the Networks permitted Wickfire to intentionally interfere with TriMax’s business in the first place. Nevertheless, based on the jury’s finding that Wickfire interfered with TriMax’s business—a finding that was not reversed or altered by the recent Final Judgment—we now hope tactics like impersonation of competitors, kickbacks, bid jamming, and click fraud, will no longer be tolerated in the online advertising industry.”

About TriMax Media:

Founded in 2003, TriMax Media is a digital marketing agency specializing in performance-based search engine marketing. TriMax served on the first Google Advertiser Research Council and was one of the first companies to generate over one million leads for its clients utilizing Google AdWords. The agency focuses on creating highly effective search marketing campaigns and developing successful long-term relationships with its clients.

Company Contact:

For questions, please contact:
Barry M. Golden
Egan Nelson LLP
214.893.9034
barry.golden@egannelson.com

Akar, Reznikov discuss issues of evacuation of civilians

Published by
Azer News

By Trend Turkish National Defense Minister Hulusi Akar had a telephone conversation with Ukrainian Defense Minister Oleksiy Reznikov, Trend reports citing the press service of the Ministry. During a telephone conversation, an exchange of views took place on the evacuation of civilians from Mariupol and the delivery of humanitarian aid. The importance of an early declaration of a ceasefire was emphasized in order to avoid an increase in human casualties and to keep humanitarian corridors open for the evacuation of civilians. It was once again stated that Turkey will continue to contribute to hu… Continue reading “Akar, Reznikov discuss issues of evacuation of civilians”