Decisions of the Arbitration Board – 11.04.2019

The TFF Arbitration Board reviewed the files on its agenda on April 11, 2019 (20) meeting and took the following decisions. (*)

1. E.2019 / 78 - K.2019 / 137 Annex

Regarding the dispute between the Menemen Municipality Sports Club Association and the footballer GAlkhan Sinanoglu, the request of the plaintiff was revised against the decision of the Board dated 04.04.2019 and numbered E.2019 / 78- K.2019 / 137. The request of the plaintiff to rectify the decision; accepting the payment documents as a result of the evaluation;

- With the recognition that this part of the receivable is finalized as no part of the UCK decision regarding the minimum wage pertaining to the minimum wage amounting to TL 32,670,26 was objected,

- Since the claimant has requested 45.000,00TL of the guarantee fee, the claimant accepts the demand as of 30.07.2017 and TL 16.500.00 of the TL 45.000,00 is due to the principle of loyalty. from the defendant club with interest from the date of collection,

- Approving other parts of the resolution of the Dispute Resolution Board,

- Judgment fee, attorney's fee and other matters to be stated in reasoned decision, by majority,

2. E.2019 / 89 - K.2019 / 145

The dispute between Mehmet Albayrak, footballer Mehmet Albayrak, and Sanliurfa Sports Club Association on the dispute resolution decision dated 25.01.2019 and numbered E.2018 / 675- K.2019 / 218 has been examined.

- The plaintiff, with the acceptance of the objection of the player will receive a 489.122,00 TL correction,

- Interest, judgment expenses, attorney's fee and other matters to be stated in a reasoned decision, by majority,

3. E.2019 / 90 - K.2019 / 146.

Galatasaray Sportif Industrial Commercial Yacht. Of the Dispute Resolution Board of the Dispute Resolution Board dated 01.02.2019 and numbered E.2018 / 694- K.2019 / 28.As a result of the negotiation; Dispute Resolution Board is understood that no decision on the procedural and substantive aspects of a violation of the applicant's rejection decision to the approval, by majority vote,

4. E.2019 / 91 - K.2019 / 147

Trabzonspor Sportif Investment and Football Management Trade. A.S., the objection of the Dispute Resolution Board of the Dispute Resolution Board dated 25.01.2019 and numbered E.2018 / 654- K.2019 / 16. As a result of the negotiation; Dispute Resolution Board is understood that no decision on the procedural and substantive aspects of a violation of the applicant's rejection decision to the approval, by majority vote,

5. E.2019 / 102 - K.2019 / 148

Trabzonspor Sportif Investment and Football Management Trade. A.S., the objection of the Dispute Resolution Board of the Dispute Resolution Board dated 21.02.2019 and numbered E.2019 / 5- K.2019 / 76. As a result of the negotiation;

Dispute Resolution Board is understood that no decision on the procedural and substantive aspects of a violation of the applicant's rejection decision to the approval, by majority vote,

6. E.2019 / 109 - K.2019 / 149

The objection of the Dispute Resolution Board of Besiktas Football Investments Industry and Trade Inc. to Matteo Ferrari with respect to the resolution dated 21.09.2018 and numbered E.2017 / 659- K.2018 / 435 was examined. As a result of the negotiation;

- The denial of the request for trial,

- Removal of the resolution of the Dispute Resolution Board ,

- The refusal of the claimant's claim to be charged,

- Judgment fee, attorney's fee and other matters to be stated in a reasoned decision, by majority,

7. E.2019 / 110 - K.2019 / 150

Nigde Anadolu Football Club and the objection of the parties to the decision dated 25.01.2019 and numbered E.2018 / 552- K.2019 / 12 of the Dispute Resolution Board of Oktay Pop. As a result of the negotiation; Dispute Resolution Board is understood that no decision on the procedural and substantive aspects of a violation of the applicant's rejection decision to the approval, by majority vote,

8. E.2019 / 126 - K.2019 / 151

The objection of AFDK to E.2018-2019 / 1567 K.2018-2019 / 2115 dated 01.04.2019 concerning the footballer of Cayeli Ramazan Yilmaz was reviewed. As a result of the negotiation;

- Due to Cayeli Sports Club Footballer of maintaining Ramadan Yilmaz from engaging in attacks on rival team players and the action insistently Photodynamic 44/1-a in accordance with Article by banned from 5 official competitions in punishing, subut, legal characterization and misses it does in terms of the determination of the penalty it is understood that the refusal of the application shall be approved by the unanimous vote,

9. E.2019 / 127 - K.2019 / 152

The objection of the Kirsehir Municipality Sports Club to the decision of the PFDK dated 09.04.2019 dated E.2018-2019 / 838 K.2018-2019 / 1000 was examined. As a result of the negotiation;

- Due to the ugly and bad cheering caused by the supporters of the Kirsehir Municipality Sports Club and the 5th time in the competition in the same season as the host club in the same season, the PDT 53/2. in accordance with the article 1 to play the official competition without the audience in their own field and a fine of 1,500,00 TL fine, punishment, legal description and the determination of the penalty because there is a lack of injustice, the refusal of the application to approve the sentence, unanimously,

10. E.2019 / 128 - K.2019 / 153;

Galatasaray Sportif Industrial Commercial Yacht. The objection of PFDK on footballer Christian Nekadio Luyindama to E.2018-2019 / 823 K.2018-2019 / 987 dated 09.04.2019 was examined. As a result of the negotiation;

- The denial of the request for trial,

- Galatasaray Sportif Industrial Commercial Yacht. Inc. footballer Christian Nekadio Luyindama opponents players to for serious foul because Photodynamic 43. According to Article 2 official competitions banned from the punishment, subut, it is understood that the legal qualification and no misses in terms of the determination of the penalty, the application was rejected by the approval of the sentence, unanimously,

Decided.

Source: Turkey Football Federation