Washington: When the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) was first established in the 1950s, its primary goal was to address global reactions following Israel’s actions in the village of Qibya and to ensure uninterrupted US financial support for Israel. Over the years, as Israel continues its actions in the Palestinian enclave of Gaza, AIPAC has maintained its significant influence across US political spheres, actively working to suppress pro-Palestinian voices and promote Israeli interests.
According to Anadolu Agency, AIPAC employs direct methods, supporting any pro-Israel congressional candidate while targeting those critical of Israel, as explained by Walter Hixson, a retired history professor and author. This strategy has been evident in the lead-up to the US elections, with The Intercept reporting AIPAC’s financial involvement in over 80% of electoral races. Hixson highlighted AIPAC’s unparalleled presence in American politics, representing not just a foreign government but standing as one
of the most formidable lobbying groups overall.
AIPAC’s focus is primarily on Congress, operating with the backing of wealthy donors who wield significant electoral influence. The organization consists largely of conservative Jews, many of whom are Orthodox, and relies on professional lobbyists and fundraisers rather than political figures. Historically, AIPAC’s mission has been to secure regular funding for Israel, a goal that has resulted in over $150 billion in US financial support since 1948.
Hixson noted a shift in AIPAC’s political leanings toward the Republican Party and Trump, given his administration’s unconditional support for Israel. However, Rami Khouri, a Middle East analyst, cautioned against associating AIPAC too closely with any single party, emphasizing its bipartisan approach to advancing Israel’s interests.
In Congress, AIPAC demands unwavering support for Israel, with members aware of the political risks of criticizing Israeli policies. The group has reportedly spent millions to oppose
Democratic Congress members like Jamal Bowman and Corey Bush. Despite its approximately 90% success rate, some politicians like Ilhan Omar and Bernie Sanders have resisted AIPAC’s influence.
Khouri further explained AIPAC’s efforts to curtail pro-Palestinian advocacy and its attempts to legislate against criticism of Israel, though some legal challenges have pushed back against these initiatives. The changing public opinion and growing awareness of AIPAC’s role in shaping US foreign policy may eventually challenge its power.
Khouri pointed out that while AIPAC’s influence remains strong, increasing public scrutiny and a growing number of Congress members supporting equal rights for Palestinians and Israelis mark a significant shift. He believes that as public sentiment evolves, politicians might adjust their positions, leading to potential changes in US policy regarding Israel and Palestine.